Beware of the posers- mobile site deceptions
Beware of the posers- mobile site deceptions
Segment(s) of the TSC Impacted: Your Organizations Ability to Attract Candidates
Many of us know that the way we are interacting with the internet is changing rapidly, moving away from the time when we had a PC, tethered to a desk on a slow dial up connection to a fast means of accessing almost anything in the palm of our hands from almost anywhere. People are changing the way they find jobs in the same way they are changing how they shop and how they post content to their social media platforms
Although I have been and continue to be an advocate for companies moving to mobile career sites and apps, I come to you this month with a warning that should not be a surprise.
Beware of the posers
Just like in the early days of job boards and social media, there are a number of companies that are out there trying to convince you that what they have is what you seek- a mobile career site.
Last year I wondered why ATS providers were not jumping into this to gain competitive advantage.
Through my networking and collaborations with some of you, I have become aware of some interesting developments and this year we saw some of the first ATS providers coming out with mobile sites and unfortunately a couple that are outright posers.
Sadly, these companies are not small start ups or fly by night companies, they are sizeable and well known and it’s a shame that at least some of the in their organizations are pitching something that is not the truth until pressed. This month I will give you the basic questions to ask and the unfortunate half-truths that I am aware of…
The question
The first version of the question is actually quite simple and that is probably why it can be easy for a sales team to try to pull a quick one over on people. The question is:
“Does your product provide a mobile career site?”
This is where the problem lies… in its simplicity. I will take you through three instances where a potential customer could have come away with entirely the wrong impression and would have made the wrong decision, at least in regards to mobile recruiting, as a result.
Problem answer #1: Yes we have a mobile site
You may be thinking what is the problem? Well in this case, I actually don’t think the vendor was being purposely misleading, but here is a synopsis of the rest of the answer:
“Recruiters can log in review candidates, post jobs, schedule interviews, etc.”
Notice there is no mention of candidates? When asked a slightly different question, the vendor had a different answer:
“Does your product provide a mobile career site for job seekers…”
The answer? “No”
It’s nice that Recruiters can do stuff, but it’s far more important that job seekers be able to do stuff. Plus, I don’t know about you, but as a Recruiter there is only so much I am willing to do from a smartphone.
Problem answer #2: Yes we have a mobile site
Again all seems well, and the vendor happily showed the potential customer his iPhone with a cool looking app. The problem didn’t arise until one of the review team members said “Where do I look for a job?” and another asked “Why is there the ability to run payroll?”
The first problem answer was forgivable, this one is not. There was not only no ability to search jobs, there was nothing to do with recruiting on the app either… this was an HR/Payroll app shame, shame, shame.
Problem answer #3: Yes we have a mobile site
So you get it by now and are wondering what happened. Similar to the previous example, someone was proud to show off their iPhone and the team looked at it and seemed impressed until someone noticed that this was just the full website of the a client company. When pressed, the vendor maintained that they had a mobile site and it looks great. Continued pressing from the review team finally got the vendor to admit that they didn’t have a mobile site, but that “the site renders beautifully on an iPhone.”
That’s all great, but since the screen, even an iPhone is tiny, and 0.5 pitch is difficult for anyone to read I would say this vendor is a total poser… the sad thing was the person being pressed was the company’s President, not an over-eager sales person trying to get commission.
Conclusion
So beware when you meet with vendors about this new platform we all have to manage.
The key question is not whether or not they can provide a mobile site, but is actually a series or slightly more complicated questions. Here are some of the questions I recommend asking:
Does your current product provide a mobile careers site that enables job seekers to have a mobile experience similar to those visiting our full version website, including searching for and viewing jobs?
What mobile platforms do you support? iPhone, Android, iPad, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile?
Note: If they support iPhone and Android you are well covered, many iPhone apps work on an iPad; Windows Mobile market share is too small and BlackBerry is declining rapidly. If you did want to add a third platform, add iPad since an iPad app can be much more robust than an iPhone app.
Do you support mobile websites or downloadable apps, or both?
What types of content can you support? Is the site simply a job search interface or can we have text content, pictures and video to create a rich user experience?
How refined can the job search be? Do users have only a couple options or several that deliver targeted results?
Does the mobile site at any time send the user to the full version site? If the answer is yes, then it is not a mobile site!
The important thing is to not go into this blind… just like anything else!
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to send them my way!
© 2011 Michael K. Peterson, All Rights Reserved
How emerging markets could make this economic recovery different…
How emerging markets could make this economic recovery different…
Segment(s) of the TSC Impacted: All
We all seem to be waiting for the economy to turn around, and many of us have given up hope in a sense. We hear it regularly, including on my blog, “… is this the new normal?”
I think it’s a legitimate question. This recovery, if you can call it that, has been jobless and some would say almost hapless, seeming to be knocked back down by bad news coming from all fronts at all times.
Amidst all the bad news, there was a snippet of good news that could make a big difference when and how things turn around.
The rapid growth of emerging markets
This is something we really have not seen before on the scale that we have now. The impact of this on the employment market could be significant and may be the engine of economic growth that we all need to pull ourselves out of the recession and start adding jobs to the economy.
Take a look at the top 10 rising economies according to the Business Insider from March 2011.
- Nigeria
- India
- Iraq
- Bangladesh
- Vietnam
- Philippines
- Mongolia
- Indonesia
- Sri Lanka
- Egypt
Total projected GDP by 2050: $135.05 Trillion
Average year over year growth: 7.3%
I bet many of you are surprised by at least half of the countries on the list and by at least one country that is missing from the list,China. To be fair, this list is a ranking of year over year growth vs. total GDP or size of the economy, but what I find interesting is that the total GDP that they represent is still significant and when combined, significantly more than China’s.
For comparison, and to bring to light how much GDP is missing with large, still emerging, but “slower” growth economies,China’s GDP is projected to be $123 Trillion by 2040. In 2050, the top 5 countries in the G20 are projected to beChina, US,India,JapanandBrazilin that order, which points to the fact that emerging markets are widespread.
Manufacturing jobs
One of the areas that could see a significant increase in business opportunities are within the manufacturing sector. In many parts of the world, US products are still viewed to be of high quality and value. Just look at China and how American cars are viewed as a luxury item.
One question is how much this will translate to a positive impact on the US job market. Will it create many direct manufacturing jobs or will it create a smaller number of administrative and professional level jobs only because the American product is made overseas?
The other question is whether or not American companies can react quickly enough to get products that appeal to these emerging markets into the hands of their consumers to build and sustain brand loyalty. Fortunately I think we are doing fairly well in this arena, but we cannot be complacent.
Research and development jobs
One area that the US still dominates is research and development. While other countries continue to make progress, fortunately so do we!
These jobs will become more critical as we need to make products that appeal to more and more different markets to maintain market share, gain competitive advantage and continue to build brand loyalty.
So these jobs will include many of the areas that immediately come to mind (software, consumer electronics, etc.) and many that do not immediately come to mind (food products, beverages, home goods, consumer products, etc.)
Shipping/transportation and logistics jobs
Always an early indicator of a economy reviving, we could see growth here early on as companies ship more products to new markets, demand for individuals within these areas would naturally follow.
Import/Export jobs
If theUS is able to position its products to appeal to these emerging markets, demand for Import and Export Professionals could increase significantly, with the Import side depending on what products these emerging economies produce and whether or not Americans will have a need for them…
The economy in general
While the segments I spoke about will likely see a significant increase, trade and wealth generation (even in emerging economies) create jobs. So many other sectors of the economy will see some increase in job growth.
Conclusion
I think we all agree that this economy has some way to go before everyone is back to work, but this could be the light at the end of the tunnel.
Part of the challenge we have now is that we cannot rely on domestic consumer spending to pull the economy out of recession because all of us have spending constraints compared to 5 years ago.
A real possibility is the increase in consumer spending coming from overseas, with emerging markets, notEuropeleading the way and established Asian economies following closely behind. If that creates enough growth for the US consumer to feel confident again, we could see a very robust, but different, economic recovery than those of the past.
And of course that all means, the war for talent returns… this time, with some new fronts!
Feel free to share your thoughts!
© 2011 Michael K. Peterson, All Rights Reserved
How placement firms can work better with corporate recruiters and how corporate recruiters need to step up.
How placement firms can work better with corporate recruiters and how corporate recruiters need to step up.
Segment(s) of the TSC Impacted: Your Organizations Ability to Source Candidates
Hardly a day goes by without receiving some sort of pitch from a placement firm. I think this isn’t a big difference from anyone else in a leadership role within a Recruiting department, but I think what would surprise some people is what I hear from corporate recruiters that makes me want to slam my head into my desk.
So this month I thought I would give my unscientific top five things that each side needs to do better list.
Top five things that placement firms can do to work with corporate recruiters
- Know yourself and/or your organization
If your firm specializes in helping organizations that have little to no corporate recruiting capability, or does especially well helping organizations in regions that people don’t want to move to or a certain size of organization, etc. learn that, know that and own that. I can’t tell you how many times I talk to firms that in the course of our review I determine do a good job placing people, but only because the companies they work with have no recruiting team to speak of. - Figure me out before calling
I don’t expect you, as someone that is cold calling me, to know all about me (although it’s pretty easy to find out a lot about people nowadays), but at least know what industry I am in, what openings I have and a little about my teams capability. For example, on a regular basis I get calls and emails from companies that want to place people with me for Software Engineering or Electrical Engineering… well since I work for a hospital system it’s a waste of my time to even return your call now isn’t it? - Just because I have an opening doesn’t mean I need help
I can’t stand it when I open a position and an hour later I get a call from someone saying “…I see that you just posted xyz position open, do you need help?” Or I see you have (fill in the blank for an entry level position) open, can we work on that? In the first case, it would be rare that I would feel that we needed outside help and that I would post the position without already talking to someone, in the second case, I honestly should be fired it I can’t find an entry level person. - Don’t be clueless
If I am going to go to a hiring manager and recommend that we use you, do you really think if you call me and you know nothing about my company, the role, the industry, the profession and already have presented a plan to fill the role that goes beyond posting something on a bunch of job boards (guess what- I know how to do that too) that you are going to be the one I recommend? Don’t waste my time, but if you want to waste yours more power to you and call someone else… - Work within my process (if there is one)
I know you hate this, but we do need to have some kind of process in place. Most of the time, this shouldn’t get in the way and sometimes it ends up benefiting all involved. You will also appreciate the next section though, because this is one of the things I address on the corporate side as well.
Top five things that corporate recruiters can do to work with headhunters (surprise- some of this is similar to what is above!)
- Know yourself and/or your organization
For the corporate side of things, we need to know our organizations, the openings, the managers, the requirements (tangible and intangible). We also need to know what we are good at as a recruiting team and plan and react accordingly when positions are open. So if we aren’t strong recruiting certain specialties, we need to still put our best effort in and get better at it, but also need to come up with plans that probably include placement firms to meet the objective of finding the talent we need, regardless of where it comes from. Many organizations know when they have a tough position to work on, but they fail to do anything about it. - Let go of “us vs. them”
I sort of understand where this comes from… the adversarial relationship that some corporate recruiters hold on to. This is a classic example of you get what you incent. In the past, many corporate recruiting departments looked at needing a placement firm as a sign that they failed because many times that is indeed how it was viewed by leadership and internal clients. I think this has largely changed because of the complexity of the workforce and the acknowledgement that everyone cannot be good at everything. Placement firms do need to be used diligently (I would not be employed if suddenly 80% of the placements came from outside firms), but the adversarial view needs to go and good placement firms need to viewed as partners and an extension of the internal teams capability. I can’t stand it when a corporate recruiter will keep doing things they know have very little chance of working just to keep from using an outside firm. - Get out of the way
Corporate Recruiters also need to know when to get out of the way. We have a role in helping with the selection of the placement firm, negotiating the contracts, setting up reasonable processes, etc., but beyond that the gate keeper mentality needs to go. Once the contract is in place, let the placement firm talk to the hiring manager directly, there is no value in the corporate recruiter relaying this level of information. Have the placement firm submit directly to the hiring manager and have them cc: you so the candidate can be checked out internally (did they recently apply, are they a former employee?) and set up regular short status meetings so all those involved can stay on top of issues. Beyond that step aside! - Don’t be clueless
Nothing drives me nuts like when I ask a Recruiter to tell me about the role they have been working on for 2 months and all they can do is stumble around while they read me the posting… really? Well since we’ve submitted 20 people that meet those requirements, perhaps it’s time to actually pin the manager down on what they really want! We need to know the department, the manager, the role, the skills needed, etc. If we don’t then we have failed and certainly if the placement firm is not able to find this out, they will also fail. - Create a reasonable process
I touched on this a bit in number 3, but it’s worth emphasizing. Make sure the process you have is reasonable. This starts with a reasonable contract and as little intervention as possible by you. Good people can only do good work when they are allowed to by not having others get in the way. I think it’s reasonable to sit in on the meeting or conference call as the placement firm talks to the hiring manager (you will probably learn some things), but it’s not reasonable to be the gate keeper and not allow the placement firm to speak to the manager at all. It is reasonable to ask to be copied on submissions so you can check on past interactions with the candidate (if any), but I would be cautious in requiring that resumes be submitted to you and then you in turn send them on to the manager.
Conclusion
I certainly understand where a lot of the problems with the corporate recruiter placement firm relationship come from. Past measures of success (or failure) are among them, but there is an unfortunate number of placement firms that are not interested in being anyone’s partner and are only interested in fees and still more that are not malicious, but are either poorly run or are trying too hard to be what they are not.
On the corporate side, the problems also abound, with Recruiters that are nothing more than administrators that process paper to those that have no clue what their internal clients need to those that simply insecure.
Successful organizations realize that there are plenty of problems on both sides and work toward resolving them by having a strong review process in place for placement firms and in coaching and sometimes removing recruiters when they do not align themselves with the greater needs of the organization.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to send them my way!
© 2011 Michael K. Peterson, All Rights Reserved
Does .jobs matter?
Does .jobs matter?
Segment(s) of the TSC Impacted: Branding and candidate awareness, Your organizations ability to source candidates
Somewhat recently, there has been a lot of discussion about .jobs. Much of the discussion that I have seen has little to do with whether or not this is a good idea or not. Most of it centers on the controversy between SHRM, Employ Media who SHRM partnered with to manage the top level domain and ICANN, the organization that essentially manages major functions of the internet.
ICANN has brought action against Employ Media stating they are violating the .jobs charter and brings into question whether or not SHRM got in over their heads and/or partnered with the right people.
I think there is a larger more important question that may make all of this largely irrelevant- Does .jobs matter?
For those of you that aren’t familiar, .jobs is a top level domain (TLD) similar to the more popular .com, .edu and .gov. ICANN released .jobs to SHRM with the thought that the leading HR organization would be able to manage the registration process more effectively than the existing process that has been in place for all other domains. This process is where domain registration companies take registration requests and if it’s available the registration is yours.
On a side note that I have to point out, when you register a .jobs domain, you first go to Employ Media’s site, which then has… wait for it…links to the same domain registration companies that handle all the other registrations anyway, now that’s value add SHRM- thanks for adding needless layers and now legal complication to things!
Side bar over, back to the .jobs domain… The intended purpose for .jobs was to become a “shortcut” that people could use to get to career sites. So a company like Ford could have the domain ford.jobs.
On the surface this sounds interesting, but I have to wonder, who’s been wanting this?
Employers?
As an employer, I don’t see this as a huge benefit… my career site is decent, we market it well using a wide variety of tools, etc. It’s reasonably well designed and most people can find what they are looking for.
On the other hand, the .jobs domain is very inexpensive to register and you could simply have the .jobs URL point to your career site and you’re pretty well covered. So there isn’t anything compelling against getting it.
Job seekers?
It’s pretty rare that candidates can’t find a companies website and/or the jobs on it… if they can’t the sites usually poorly constructed, or the jobs aren’t listed or the candidate is computer illiterate. So some may be interested in the convenience of the .jobs domain, but I am not sure people would not seek positions on non-.jobs domains in the same manner I could eventually see job seekers not apply for jobs with companies that lack a mobile or social media presence.
Job boards?
Certainly the job board industry isn’t interested in it. In fact, they are leading the charge against the .jobs domain because they see it as a threat. Just imagine a day where job seekers can find jobs on corporate career sites or by using something like SEO, SEM, Indeed, SimplyHired, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn… if only these things were a reality … oh wait… that’s right, they are aren’t they? Well job boards you keep chasing away the big scary .jobs domain while everyone else eats your lunch…
Conclusion
So I guess there isn’t anyone that is clamoring for this. While there are a lot of companies that have their .jobs domain (including mine) I think they have it because it is cheap and simple.
And just because a lot of companies have .jobs domains doesn’t mean that it will become anything significant or strategically or tactically important.
What’s my opinion? .jobs doesn’t matter, but it will be widely used for a time and then fade away. I think it’s an idea whose time has long passed that is only being saved by its simplicity and very modest cost.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to send them my way!
© 2011 Michael K. Peterson, All Rights Reserved
SocialVibe